Solving the problem of multi-criteria optimization of the synthesis reaction of benzylalkyl esters by the method of «ideal» point and lexicographic ordering
https://doi.org/10.23947/2587-8999-2022-1-1-12-18
Abstract
The result obtained in the course of solving optimization problems is relevant for use in industrial and laboratory processes. Multi-criteria optimization involves optimizing two or more conflicting objective functions.
Materials and methods. On the basis of the kinetic model of the catalytic reaction of the synthesis of benzylalkyl esters, the task of multi-criteria optimization is set taking into account the variable parameters: temperature, molar ratio of reagents and the time of carrying out, which have limitations. The use of the methods of «ideal» point and lexicographic ordering is justified.
Results. An algorithm for solving the multi-criteria optimization problem has been developed. Using the kinetic model of the synthesis of benzylalkyl esters, the problem of MKO of the conditions of conducting was solved and optimal values of the variable parameters of the system were obtained, at which the output of the target product was maximized and the by-products of the chemical process were minimized.
Discussion and conclusions. Multi-criteria optimization of this process will make it possible to give technological recommendations for the industrial implementation of the process with maximum output of target products and minimum content of by-products. The paper presents two methods for solving the problem, since in order to apply the results obtained in practice, the recommendations of the decision-maker must be taken into account.
Keywords
About the Authors
K. F. KoledinaRussian Federation
Kamila F. Koledina - Doct.Sci. (Phys.-Math.), associate professor, researcher, associate professor of the Mathematics Department, Institute of Petrochemistry and Catalysis of RAS, Ufa State Petroleum Technological University.
Kosmonavtov St., Ufa
A. A. Alexandrova
Russian Federation
Anastasiya A. Alexandrova - student, Ufa State Petroleum Technological University.
Kosmonavtov St., Ufa
References
1. Koledina, K.F. Kinetics and mechanism of synthesis of benzylbutyl ether in the presence of copper-containing catalysts / K.F. Koledina, I.M.Gubaidullin, S.N.Koledin, A.R.Baiguzina, L.I.Gallyamova, R.I. Khusnutdinov // Journal of Physical Chemistry. 2019. Vol. 93, No. 11. p. 1668-1673.
2. Koledina K.F. Multi-objective optimization of chemical reaction conditions based on a kinetic model / K. F. Koledina, S. N. Koledin, A. P. Karpenko, I. M. Gubaydullin, M. K. Vovdenko // Journal of Mathematical Chemistry, 2019. Vol.57, Is. 2. p. 484-493
3. Panteleev A.V. Optimization methods in examples and problems: Textbook. Manual / A.V. Panteleev, T. A. Letova. M.: Higher School, 2002. 44 p.
4. Karpenko, A.P. Modern search engine optimization algorithms. Algorithms inspired by nature: a textbook / A.P. Karpenko. Moscow: Publishing House of Bauman Moscow State Technical University, 2014. 446 p.
5. Goldstein, A.L. Multicriteria genetic algorithm / A.L. Goldstein // Bulletin of Perm National Research Polytechnic University. Electrical engineering, information technology, control systems. 2013. No. 8. p. 14-22.
6. Wang, R. Preference-Inspired Co-evolutionary Algorithms: a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment for the degree of the Doctor of Philosophy / R. Wang. University of Sheffield, 2013. 231p.
7. Goldberg, D.E. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning / D.E. Goldberg. Addison-Wesley, 1989. 432 p.
8. Sobol, I.M. The choice of optimal parameters in problems with many criteria: studies.handbook for universities / I.M. Sobol, R.B. Statnikov. 2nd ed., reprint. and additional – M.:Bustard, 2006. 175 p.
9. Abraham, A. Evolutionary multiobjective optimization: theoretical advances and applications. / A. Abraham, L. Jain, D. Goldberg. – New York: Springer Science, 2005. 302 p.
10. Deb, K. Towards a quick computation of well-spread Pareto-optimal solutions / K. Deb, M. Mohan, S. Mishra // Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization. Springer. 2003. pp. 222-236.
11. Corne, D. Pesa-II: Region-based selection in evolutionary multiobjective optimization / D. Corne, N. Jerram, J. Knowles, M. Oates // GECCO 2001: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, 2001. pp. 283-290.
12. Chowdhury, S. A mixed-discrete particle swarm optimization algorithm with explicit diversity-preservation / S. Chowdhury, W. Tong, A. Messac, J. Zhang // Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization. 2013. Vol.47 (3). pp. 367-388.
13. Groshev, S.V. Efficiency of population algorithms of Pareto approximation. Experimental comparison / S.V. Groshev, A.P. Karpenko, V.A. Martynyuk // Online journal Naukovedenie. Vol. 8. No. 4 2016. pp. 123-131.
14. Koledina, K.F. Optimization of chemical reactions by economic criteria based on kinetics of the process / K.F. Koledina, S.N. Koledin, I.M. Gubaydullin // CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 1966. 2017. pp. 5-9.
15. Karpenko, A.P. Basic essences of population algorithms for the global optimization problem / A.P.Karpenko // Information and mathematical technologies in science and management. 2016. No. 2. pp. 8-17.
Review
For citations:
Koledina K.F., Alexandrova A.A. Solving the problem of multi-criteria optimization of the synthesis reaction of benzylalkyl esters by the method of «ideal» point and lexicographic ordering. Computational Mathematics and Information Technologies. 2022;6(1):12-18. https://doi.org/10.23947/2587-8999-2022-1-1-12-18